SEO Is Not Dead. But If You're Only Doing SEO, You're Already Behind.
“Should we focus on SEO or GEO?”
It’s the wrong question, but I hear it constantly. The right question is: “What’s the optimal investment balance between SEO and GEO for our specific situation?”
Both channels matter. They serve different purposes. They require different tactics. And the right mix depends on factors specific to your business.
Definitions
How They Differ
| Factor | SEO | GEO |
|---|---|---|
| Target | Search engine rankings | AI recommendations |
| Primary metric | SERP position | Mention frequency |
| Key inputs | Content, links, technical factors | Reddit, reviews, clarity |
| Time to results | 3-6 months | 6-12+ months |
| Control level | High (you own your site) | Lower (depends on external sources) |
| Decay rate | Gradual | Slower (training data persists) |
Where They Overlap
Despite different mechanisms, SEO and GEO share common ground:
Content Quality
Both reward content that genuinely answers questions. Thin, keyword-stuffed content fails at both SEO (after recent Google updates) and GEO (LLMs detect low quality). Our guide on creating AI-friendly content covers the specific techniques for writing content that works for both channels.
Clarity of Positioning
Vague positioning hurts both. Google struggles to rank ambiguous content for relevant queries. LLMs struggle to recommend products with unclear use cases.
Authority Signals
Both weight authority. SEO uses backlinks as authority signals. GEO uses mentions in trusted sources. Building genuine authority helps both.
Technical Foundation
Clean, structured websites with semantic HTML and schema markup improve both search engine understanding and LLM parsing.
The Traffic Reality
SEO isn’t dead. Google still sends massive traffic. The reports of SEO’s death are exaggerated.
But traffic patterns are shifting:
- AI-assisted searches growing rapidly
- “reddit” appended to queries increasingly common
- Zero-click searches reducing some SEO value
- AI overviews changing SERP behavior
The question isn’t whether SEO still matters. It’s how the mix is changing.
When to Prioritize SEO
SEO should be primary focus when:
You Need Results Faster
SEO can show results in 3-6 months. GEO typically takes 6-12+ months. If you need pipeline now, SEO delivers faster.
You’re in a High-Search-Volume Category
Some categories still see massive search volume. If 10,000 people monthly search “best CRM for agencies,” SEO captures that demand.
You Have Content Advantages
Strong content team? Technical SEO expertise? These assets favor SEO investment.
Your Buyers Still Search
Some audiences are search-first. Enterprise buyers, certain verticals, and older demographics still rely primarily on Google.
When to Prioritize GEO
GEO should be primary focus when:
Your Buyers Use AI Assistants
If your target customers ask ChatGPT for recommendations, you need GEO visibility.
You’re in a New Category
For emerging categories without established search volume, GEO matters more. AI recommendations can create demand that search queries haven’t caught up to yet.
Competitors Are Already There
If competitors dominate AI recommendations and you’re invisible, GEO becomes urgent regardless of other factors. Running a competitive AI visibility audit will show you exactly how big the gap is.
You’re Building for the Long Term
GEO compounds more slowly but persists longer. Training data creates lasting presence. Long-term players benefit from early GEO investment.
The Integrated Strategy
For most B2B SaaS companies, the answer isn’t SEO or GEO. It’s both, integrated.
Budget Allocation Framework
A rough framework for investment allocation:
Early Stage (Pre-PMF)
- SEO: 20%
- GEO: 80%
Rationale: Building early community presence creates lasting GEO advantage. SEO competition is often too fierce for pre-PMF resources.
Growth Stage ($1M-$10M ARR)
- SEO: 50%
- GEO: 50%
Rationale: Need both demand capture (SEO) and future positioning (GEO). Balance investment.
Scale Stage ($10M+ ARR)
- SEO: 40%
- GEO: 60%
Rationale: SEO likely established. GEO becomes competitive differentiation.
These ratios adjust based on your specific market and competitive dynamics.
The Future Trajectory
The importance of GEO will increase. AI-assisted search and discovery is growing. The companies investing now build advantages that compound.
But SEO isn’t going away. Traditional search will evolve but persist. Smart companies invest in both rather than betting everything on one channel.
- SEO gets you found on search; GEO gets you recommended by AI
- Both matter for B2B SaaS; the balance depends on your situation
- Significant overlap exists: content quality, positioning clarity, authority signals
- SEO delivers faster results; GEO compounds more slowly but persists longer
- Most companies need integrated strategies covering both channels
- Budget allocation shifts as company stage changes
- GEO importance will increase, but SEO isn’t disappearing
Try Delulu9 free for 1 day
Keyword research from Claude Code. Google + Bing + Reddit data. $12/mo after trial.
Start Free Trial