SEO MCP vs DataForSEO: Raw API Power vs Ready-to-Use Keyword Intelligence
DataForSEO is the kind of tool that makes engineers excited. Huge API surface, data from 100+ search engines, pay-per-request pricing down to fractions of a cent. If you want raw SEO data at scale, it’s one of the best options available.
But raw data and useful intelligence aren’t the same thing. If you’ve been eyeing a dataforseo alternative that gives you keyword research with AI integration baked in – without building the plumbing yourself – SEO MCP by Delulu9 is worth considering.
DataForSEO: The Data Firehose
DataForSEO is an API-first SEO data provider. Keywords, SERPs, backlinks, app store data, content analysis – it covers an enormous surface. Pricing is pay-as-you-go, typically $0.0006 to $0.01 per request depending on the endpoint.
The data quality is excellent. The coverage is deep. And if you’re building an SEO tool or dashboard, DataForSEO is probably already on your shortlist as a data source.
The catch? There’s no MCP server. No Claude integration. No intent categorization out of the box. You get data, and then you build everything else yourself. That’s fine if you’re an SEO toolmaker. It’s a lot of overhead if you just want keyword insights while writing content.
SEO MCP: Intelligence Over Infrastructure
SEO MCP by Delulu9 is a different kind of tool. Instead of giving you a raw data API and saying “build what you need,” it delivers keyword research as a finished product. MCP server, REST API, intent categorization, difficulty scoring, and Claude/Cursor templates – all included.
It pulls from Google, Bing, and Reddit. The Reddit data is a genuine differentiator since so many commercial-intent searches now lead to Reddit threads. You get keyword suggestions with context about how those terms are actually discussed in real communities.
Flat pricing: $12/mo. No per-request math, no surprise invoices.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | DataForSEO | SEO MCP |
|---|---|---|
| Keyword data | Yes (100+ engines) | Yes (Google, Bing, Reddit) |
| SERP data | Yes | No |
| Backlinks | Yes | No |
| MCP server | No | Yes |
| Claude/Cursor integration | No (DIY) | Yes (built-in) |
| Intent categorization | No (DIY) | Yes |
| Difficulty scoring | Yes | Yes |
| Reddit data | Limited | Yes |
| Templates | No | Yes |
| Pricing | ~$0.0006-0.01/request | $12/mo flat |
The Build vs Buy Decision
The seo mcp vs dataforseo comparison really comes down to whether you want to build or buy.
DataForSEO gives you ingredients. Great ingredients. But you need to write the code that turns those API responses into actionable keyword intelligence. You need to build the MCP wrapper, the intent classification, the scoring models. If you’re already doing that for a product, DataForSEO is a great data source.
SEO MCP gives you the finished meal. Connect it to Claude Code, run a query, get keywords with intent and difficulty. Done. You’re researching content topics in minutes, not days.
Cost Comparison
With DataForSEO, your monthly cost depends on usage. Light usage might cost less than $12/mo. Heavy usage could cost significantly more. You also have to factor in development time for integration.
SEO MCP is $12/mo regardless of how much you use it. For solo developers and small teams, the predictability alone is worth it.
Who Should Pick What
Go with DataForSEO if you’re building SEO tooling, need data from 100+ engines, or want granular control over every API call. It’s an infrastructure play.
Go with SEO MCP if you want keyword research that works inside Claude Code today with no setup, includes Reddit data, and costs a predictable $12/mo. It’s an intelligence play.
Most developers writing content don’t need a data firehose. They need answers. SEO MCP delivers those answers faster and cheaper.
Try Delulu9 free for 1 day
Keyword research from Claude Code. Google + Bing + Reddit data. $12/mo after trial.
Start Free Trial