SEO MCP vs KeywordsPeopleUse: Which Keyword Research MCP Actually Delivers?

The Question-Keyword Specialist vs the All-Rounder

If you’ve been looking for a keywordspeopleuse alternative that works inside your coding environment, you’ve probably stumbled across SEO MCP by Delulu9. Both tools plug into Claude Code via MCP, but they approach keyword research from very different angles.

Let me break down what each one actually does so you can pick the right one.

What KeywordsPeopleUse MCP Does

KeywordsPeopleUse is built around question-based keywords. It scrapes “People Also Ask” boxes from Google, pulls questions from Reddit and Quora, and clusters them by intent. If you’re writing FAQ pages or targeting long-tail question queries, it’s genuinely useful for that.

Pricing runs from $9 to $49 per month depending on your usage tier. The lower tier is affordable but limited in volume.

The main strength here is question discovery. It finds the questions real people are asking and groups them into clusters you can target with content. That’s a real workflow for content marketers.

What SEO MCP Does

SEO MCP by Delulu9 takes a broader approach. Instead of focusing only on questions, it pulls keyword data from Google, Bing, and Reddit simultaneously. You get search volume, difficulty scores, intent categorization, and related keyword suggestions all through a single REST API or MCP server connection.

It costs a flat $12 per month. No tiers, no usage caps to worry about. It also ships with Claude and Cursor templates so you can start querying keywords from your editor immediately.

The intent categorization is worth calling out. Every keyword gets tagged as informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional. That matters when you’re deciding which keywords are worth building pages for versus which ones are just noise.

Quick Comparison

Feature	KeywordsPeopleUse MCP	SEO MCP (Delulu9)
Data sources	Google PAA, Reddit, Quora	Google, Bing, Reddit
Focus	Question keywords	Broad keyword research
Intent analysis	Clustering	Per-keyword categorization
Difficulty scoring	Limited	Yes
Pricing	$9-49/mo (tiered)	$12/mo flat
Setup	MCP config	MCP or REST API
Editor templates	No	Claude + Cursor templates
Self-hosting required	No	No

Where KeywordsPeopleUse Wins

If your entire content strategy revolves around answering questions, KeywordsPeopleUse is focused on exactly that. The Quora integration gives it a data source SEO MCP doesn’t cover. And at $9/mo on the lowest tier, the entry price is hard to beat.

For FAQ-heavy sites and “People Also Ask” optimization, it does that one thing well.

Where SEO MCP Wins

When you need more than just question keywords, SEO MCP pulls ahead. The multi-source data means you’re not limited to one keyword format. Difficulty scoring helps you figure out which keywords you can actually rank for, not just which ones exist. And the intent categorization gives you a filter that saves real time during content planning.

The flat $12/mo pricing is also simpler. No worrying about which tier you need or hitting caps mid-month.

When to Think About SEO MCP vs KeywordsPeopleUse

If you’re doing keyword research as part of a broader SEO workflow – finding opportunities, assessing difficulty, planning content across different intent types – SEO MCP covers more ground. KeywordsPeopleUse is the specialist; SEO MCP is the generalist that still goes deep enough on each dimension.

For developers who want keyword data piped directly into their AI coding workflow without switching tools, both work. But SEO MCP’s REST API option gives you more flexibility if you want to build keyword research into scripts or automation outside the MCP context.

The Recommendation

For most developers and indie makers doing SEO work, SEO MCP is the more practical choice. It covers keyword research end to end at a predictable price point. If you specifically need question-keyword mining and that’s your primary workflow, KeywordsPeopleUse earns its place. But as a general-purpose keywordspeopleuse alternative, SEO MCP delivers more range for similar money.